Notstandsspruchpraxis als Menschenrechtssystemschutz

Zusatztext

States of emergencies often pose a greater threat to human rights than to the state itself. Max Milas examines how human rights adjudicative bodies in Europe, the Americas, Africa, and the UN have developed and applied consistent standards in states of emergencies - upholding human rights through a shared, legitimacy-driven approach.

Autorenportrait

Born 1995; studied law at the University of Münster and the University of Sydney (Australia); research assistant at the Chair of Public Law, International and European Law and Empirical Legal Research at the University of Münster; legal clerkship at the Hanseatic Higher Regional Court (Hamburg); research assistant, GÖRG (environmental and planning law), Hamburg.

Weitere Details